Centipede Systems 416 or Erostek ET-232? Side-by-side funscript compatibility: connection types, how each syncs with HaptiQ, and setup routes.
Centipede Systems 416 funscript · Setup guide
Erostek ET-232 funscript · Setup guide
Yes. Both are in HaptiQ's device index, and a funscript is device-agnostic — the same motion file plays on either. What differs is how each one connects.
The Centipede Systems 416 connects over WiFi or cloud, with no Bluetooth pairing at all. The Erostek ET-232 connects over wired USB, driven through Intiface Central on a desktop.
The Centipede Systems 416 is the simpler setup: it pairs straight from the browser, while the Erostek ET-232 needs Intiface Central running because a browser cannot reach its transport directly.
Centipede Systems 416: any modern browser, since the connection is handled outside it. Erostek ET-232: any modern browser, since the connection is handled outside it.
Both are classed as an estim machine in the index, so a script written for one should feel broadly similar on the other.
Yes, the same way for both: upload a video or paste a link, and HaptiQ's motion analysis produces a .funscript. Large files upload in parts, so multi-gigabyte VR video is supported.
This comparison is generated from the HaptiQ device index — it does not rate feel, build quality, or value.
Create a free HaptiQ account to generate a funscript for either device from your own video.