OhMiBod Sphinx vs Zalo Nave

OhMiBod Sphinx or Zalo Nave? Side-by-side funscript compatibility: connection types, how each syncs with HaptiQ, and setup routes.

OhMiBod Sphinx

OhMiBod Sphinx funscript · Setup guide

Zalo Nave

Zalo Nave funscript · Setup guide

Frequently asked questions

Do both the OhMiBod Sphinx and the Zalo Nave work with HaptiQ?

Yes. Both are in HaptiQ's device index, and a funscript is device-agnostic — the same motion file plays on either. What differs is how each one connects.

What is the difference in how they connect?

The OhMiBod Sphinx connects over Bluetooth LE, paired directly from a Chromium browser. The Zalo Nave connects over Bluetooth LE in host mode, driven through Intiface Central.

Which one is easier to set up with HaptiQ?

The OhMiBod Sphinx is the simpler setup: it pairs straight from the browser, while the Zalo Nave needs Intiface Central running because a browser cannot reach its transport directly.

Which browsers work with each?

OhMiBod Sphinx: Chromium browsers only (no Safari or Firefox). Zalo Nave: any modern browser, since the connection is handled outside it.

Are they the same kind of device?

Both are classed as a nipple clamps in the index, so a script written for one should feel broadly similar on the other.

Can I generate a funscript for either from my own video?

Yes, the same way for both: upload a video or paste a link, and HaptiQ's motion analysis produces a .funscript. Large files upload in parts, so multi-gigabyte VR video is supported.

This comparison is generated from the HaptiQ device index — it does not rate feel, build quality, or value.

Create a free HaptiQ account to generate a funscript for either device from your own video.

Open in HaptiQ