Centipede Systems 416-AC or Erostek ET-232? Side-by-side funscript compatibility: connection types, how each syncs with HaptiQ, and setup routes.
Centipede Systems 416-AC funscript · Setup guide
Erostek ET-232 funscript · Setup guide
Yes. Both are in HaptiQ's device index, and a funscript is device-agnostic — the same motion file plays on either. What differs is how each one connects.
The Centipede Systems 416-AC connects over WiFi or cloud, with no Bluetooth pairing at all. The Erostek ET-232 connects over wired USB, driven through Intiface Central on a desktop.
The Centipede Systems 416-AC is the simpler setup: it pairs straight from the browser, while the Erostek ET-232 needs Intiface Central running because a browser cannot reach its transport directly.
Centipede Systems 416-AC: any modern browser, since the connection is handled outside it. Erostek ET-232: any modern browser, since the connection is handled outside it.
Both are classed as an estim machine in the index, so a script written for one should feel broadly similar on the other.
Yes, the same way for both: upload a video or paste a link, and HaptiQ's motion analysis produces a .funscript. Large files upload in parts, so multi-gigabyte VR video is supported.
This comparison is generated from the HaptiQ device index — it does not rate feel, build quality, or value.
Create a free HaptiQ account to generate a funscript for either device from your own video.